Review Process

Peer-Review Process

IJPSN Follows Double Blind Peer View Process

Editor in Chief receives the article and Conducts preliminary evaluation based on the scope of the article, suitability for our journal. Based on this he accepts or rejects for further evaluation.

Shortlisted Articles are then checked for Plagiarism and other document Checks.

Based on the Plagiarism report it is then given to concerned subject experts (Double Blind) among the Editorial Board (Name of author is removed and given). Based on their review, Editor-in-chief decides to accept/Reject the article, Articles are finally accepted subject to author participation in changes suggested by Editorial Board.

Once all things are done, articles are grouped and selected in the appropriate Issue by Editor-in-Chief.

Editorial Board generally decides on acceptance in 1-2 Months from the time of submission.