Development and Evaluation of Optimized Gastroretentive Mucoadhesive Tablets of Famotidine for Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37285/ijpsn.2015.8.3.10

Authors

  • Suryavanshi Vishal
  • Sayyed Nazim
  • Imran Khan

Abstract

The aim of the present investigation was to increase the gastric residence time of Famotidine by designing and optimization of gastroretentive mucoadhesive tablet, thereby improving bioavailability of Famotidine. Famotidine conventional tablets have been reported by many Scientists to exhibit poor oral bioavailability and fluctuations in plasma drug concentration. This results, either in precipitation of side effects or reduction in drug concentration at the target site. Famotidine is a histamine H2-receptor antagonist. It is widely prescribed in active duodenal ulcers, gastric ulcers, Zollinger-Ellison syndrome and gastro esophageal reflux disease. The effective treatment requires administration of 20 mg of Famotidine 4 times a day. A conventional dose of 20 mg can inhibit gastric acid secretion up to 6 hours but not up to 12 hours. An alternative dose of 40 mg leads to plasma fluctuations; thus a sustained release dosage form of famotidine is desirable. The short biological half-life of drug (2.5-4 hours) also favors development of a sustained release formulation. Thus objective of present study to reduce the dosing frequency by developing, optimizing and evaluating gastroretentive mucoadhesive tablet for sustain release. A 32 full factorial design is employed to study the effect of independent variables like Carbopol-940 and HPMC K100M, which significantly influence characteristics like  ex-vivo mucoadhesive strength and in-vitro drug release. Tablets were prepared by direct compression technique. No significant change was observed in physical appearance, drug content, hardness, mucoadhesive strength, in vitro dissolution pattern after the stability tasting for one month.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Keywords:

Gastroretentive mucoadhesive tablet, Famotidine, mucoadhesive strength, in-vitro drug release, stability study, factorial design.

Downloads

Published

2015-08-30

How to Cite

1.
Vishal S, Nazim S, Khan I. Development and Evaluation of Optimized Gastroretentive Mucoadhesive Tablets of Famotidine for Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease. Scopus Indexed [Internet]. 2015 Aug. 30 [cited 2024 May 18];8(3):2955-66. Available from: http://www.ijpsnonline.com/index.php/ijpsn/article/view/799

Issue

Section

Research Articles

References

Arvapally S., Kumar A. B., Dr. Rao V.U., Kiran S., Supraja S (2013). Formulation and evaluation of floating bioadhesive tablets of Ciprofloxacin HCl using natural polymers. Int. J. Advances in Pharma. Sci. 4(4): 1332-1339.

Brahmankar D. and Jaiswal S (2009). Biopharmaceutics and Pharmacokinetics A Treatise. 1st edition. Vallabh Prakashan. New Delhi. 232-242.

Chatwal G.R and Sham K. A (2007). Instrumental methods of chemical analysis. 5th revised edition. Himalaya publishing house. 2.55-2.67.

Dr. Baviskar D.T and Dr. Jain D.K (2012). Novel drug delivery systems.1st edition, Nirali Prakashan.11.1-11.40.

Gudigennavar A. S., Vijapur L.S., Patil C.C. and Kulkarni R.V (2013). Development and evaluation of gastro-retentive drug delivery systems of cefuroxime axetil. African J. Pharm. Pharmacology. 7(20): 1332-1338.

Indian Pharmacopoeia (2007). Government of Indian Ministry of Health and Welfare. Delhi. 1: 177-183.

Jain M., Sharma N., Khinchi M.P., Agrawal D (2013). A Review On Mucoadhesive Tablets As Controlled Drug Delivery System. Asian J. Pharm. Res & Development. 1(1): 125-139.

Kendre P.N., Lateef S.N., Godge R.K., Chaudhari P.D., Fernandes S. L. and Vibhute S.K (2010). Oral Sustained Delivery of Theophylline Floating Matrix Tablets- Formulation and In-vitro Evaluation. Int. J. Pharm. Tech. Res. 2(1): 130-139.

Kshirsagar S.J., Wadekar S.B., Bhalekar M.R., Ughade P.B. and Madgulkar A.R (2011). Gastroretentive drug delivery system of hydrochlorothiazide: formulation, optimization and in vivo evaluation. Asian J. Pharma. Sci. 6(3-4): 166-175.

Kumar S., Jamil F., Rajput M. and Sharma S (2012).Gastro Retentive Drug Delivery System: Features and Fact. Int. J. Res Pharm & Biomedical Sci. 3(1): 125-136.

Lachman L, Liberman H.A. and Kranig J.L (1987). The Theory and Practice of Industrial pharmacy. 3rd edition. Mumbai, Varghese publishing house. 296-300.

Lambert J.B (1987). Introduction to Organic Spectroscopy. Macmillan publication. New York.1-6.

Mantry S, Patnaik A, Satish S.M. and Mishra S (2012). Formulation and evaluation of gastroretentive floating bioadhesive tablet of Tinidazole. Int. J. Pharma. Industrial Res. 2(4): 359-365.

Masih D (2012). Development and Evaluation of Floating Dosage Form Containing Atenolol. Int. J. Pharma. Innov. 2(5): 38-49.

Paul Y., Kumar S. and Sehrawat R (2012). Design, Development and Characterization of Mucoadhesive Tablets of Atenolol. Int. J. Pharma. Bio. Sci. 3(1): 383-395.

Rathee P., Jain M., Rathee S., Nanda A. and Hooda A (2012). Gastroretentive Drug Delivery Systems: A Review of Formulation Approaches. The Pharma Inno. J. 1(8): 79-107.

Shaikh DM., Shende M.A and Shaikh A.M (2013). Formulation Development and Evaluation of Gastro Retentive Mucoadhesive Tablets Using Synthetic Polymers. Int. J. Res Pharm Biomedical Sci. 4(4): 1264-1271.

Sharma Y.R (2009). Elementary organic Spectroscopy. 4th edition, published by S. Chand. 69-133.

Singh S.K., Bothara S.B., Singh S., Patel R. and Dodia R (2010). Formulation and evaluation of mucoadhesive tablet: Influence of some hydrophilic polymer on the release rate and in vitro evaluation. Int. J. Pharma. Sci. Nanotech. 3(3): 1111-1119.

Subrahmanyam C.V.S (2010). Textbook of Physical pharmaceutics. 2nd edition, published by Vallabh Prakashan, Delhi. 210-228.

Tripathi KD (2010). Essential of Medical Pharmacology. Sixth edition, Jaypee brother’s medical publishers. 647-648.