Development and Characterization Colchicine-Loaded PEGylated Gelatin Nanoparticles for Targeted Delivery to Tumor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37285/ijpsn.2013.6.2.8

Authors

  • G D Chandrethiya
  • P K Shelat
  • M N Zaveri

Abstract

PEGylated gelatin nanoparticles loaded with colchicine were prepared by ethanol precipitation method. Poly-(ethylene glycol)-5000-monomethylether (MPEG 5000), a hydrophilic polymer, was used to pegylate gelatin.  Gluteraldehyde was used as cross-linking agent. To obtain a high quality product, major formulation parameters were optimized.  Spherical particles with mean particles of 193 nm were measured by a Malvern particle size analyzer. Entrapment efficiency was found to be 71.7 ± 1.4% and determined with reverse phase high performance liquid charomatography (RP-HPLC). The in vitro drug release study was performed by dialysis bag method for a period of 168 hours. Lyophilizaton study showed sucrose at lower concentrations proved the best cryoprotectant for this formulation.  Stability study revealed that lyophilized nanoparticles were equally effective (p < 0.05) after one year of storage at 2-8°C with ambient humidity. In vitro antitumoral activity was accessed using the MCF-7 cell line by MTT assay.  The IC50 value was found to be 0.034 μg/ml for the prepared formulation. The results indicate that PEGylated gelatin nanoparticles could be utilized as a potential drug delivery for targeted drug delivery of tumors.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Keywords:

Nanoparticles, PEGylation, anticancer drug, colchicine, gelatin

Downloads

Published

2013-08-31

How to Cite

1.
Chandrethiya GD, Shelat PK, Zaveri MN. Development and Characterization Colchicine-Loaded PEGylated Gelatin Nanoparticles for Targeted Delivery to Tumor. Scopus Indexed [Internet]. 2013 Aug. 31 [cited 2024 May 18];6(2):2058-63. Available from: http://www.ijpsnonline.com/index.php/ijpsn/article/view/622

Issue

Section

Research Articles

References

Bhadra D, Bhadra S, Jain P and NK (2002). Pegnology: a review of PEG – ylated systems. Pharmazie 57: 5-29.

Chan JM, Valencia PM, Zhang L, Langer R and Farokhzad OC(2010). Polymeric nanoparticles for drug delivery. Methods Mol Biol 624: 163-175.

Desai MP, Labhasetwar V, Amidon GL and Levy RJ (1996). Gastronitestinal uptake of biodegradable microparticles: effect of particle size. Pharm Res 13: 1838 18–45.

Donald E, Owens III, Nicholas A and Peppas(2006). Opsonisation, Biodistribution, and Pharmacokinetic of polymeric Nanoparticles. Int J Pharmaceutics 307: 93-102.

Fabienne Danhier, Nathalie Lecouturier, Benoit Vroman, Christine JeroJacaueline Marchand- Brynaert, Olivier Feron and Veronique Preat (2009). Paclitaxel loaded PEGylated PLGA-based nanoparticles: In vitro and Invivo evaluation. J Control Rel 133: 11-17.

Gref R., Y. MInamitake T., M. Piracchia and R. Langer (1996). Poly (ethylene glycol) –coated biodegradable nanosphere for intravenous drug administration, In: Microparticulte systems for delivery of proteins and vaccines edited by Cohen S, and H. Bernstein. Marcel Dekker, New York 279-306.

Kommareddy S, Tiwari SB and Amiji MM (2005). Long – circulating polymeric nanovectors for tumor - selective gene delivery. Technology of Cancer Treatment 4: 615-625.

Kreuter J, Ramage P, V.Hamm S, Gelpernia SE, Engeltardt B, Alyautdin R, von Briesen H and Begley DJ (2003). Direct evidence that polysorbate – 80 – Coated poly (butycyanocrylate) Nanoparticles deliver drugs to the CNS via specific mechanisms requiring prior binding of drug to the nanoparticles. Pharm Res 20: 409-416.

Kroil, Pagel MA, Muldoon LL, Roman – Goldstein S, Flamengo SA and Neuwelt EA (1998). Improving drug delivery to intracerebral tumor and surrounding brain in a rodent model. A comparison of osmotic versus bradykinin modification of the blood – brain and/or blood – tumor barriers. Neurosurgery 43: 879-886.

Lee M and Kim SW (2005). Polyethylene glycol – conjugated copolymers for plasmid DNA delivery. Pharm Res 22: 1-10.

Lisa Brannon-Peppas, Jameo O and Blanchette (2004). Nanoparticles and targeted system for cancer therapy. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 56: 1649-1659

Mehnert W. and Mader K. (2001). Solid lipid nanoparticles: Production, characterization and application. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 47: 165-196.

Milo Gibaldi Pharma book Syndicate (2006). Biopharmaceutics & Clinical Pharmacokinetics.Fourth edition 147-175.

Sarkar K. and Yang H (2010). Encapsulation and Extended release of Anti-cancer Anastrozole by Stealth Nanoparticles. Nanotech Conference & Expo, Anaheim, CA.

Seda R, Tigli Aydin and Mehlika Pulat (2012). 5-Fluorouracil loaded chitosan nanoparticles for pH stimulated drug delivery: Evaluation of Controlled Release Kinetic. J Nanomaterials Article 10.

Shahgaldian P., Gualbert. J., Aissa. K. and Coleman A (2003). Study of the freeze drying conditions of calixarene based solid lipid nanoparticles. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 55: 181-184.

Wong CF, Yuen KH and Peh KK (1999). Formulation and evaluation of controlled release eudragit buccal patches. Int J Pharm 178: 11-22.

Yuan F, Dellian M, Fukumura M, Berk B D, Torchillin VP and Jain RK (1995). Vascular permeability in human tumor xenograft, Molecular size dependence and cut off size. Cancer Res 55: 3752-3756.